Christie first admitted that the charms of her great Belgian sleuth, Hercule Poirot, had worn a bit thin on her after nearly half a century spent with him:
"a shrewd knowledge of human nature" Christie's Hercule Poirot |
Interjected the interviewer, "Like James Bond?"
"I've read some of those," a "smiling" Christie answered. "They're fun and they have that gadget appeal to youngsters...."
Christie went on to note, however, that she personally preferred reading the crime fiction of Georges Simenon ("those characters") and Elizabeth Daly ("scholarly writing, real people and plots arising from real-life situations").
licensed to kill Fleming's James Bond |
Regarding the Bond saga, the critic opined:
Gadgetry will date a story faster than slang, and, unfortunately, in 25 years James Bond will seem as dated as the mad-scientist movies of the 1930's do to us today....I do not mean to derogate Mr. Fleming, and I have seen every one of the Bond movies to date, but they really contain very little about human nature in them. The characters...bear little relation to reality.
A half-century later, Anthony Horowitz has published a new authorized Bond novel, Trigger Mortis, and Spectre, the twenty-fourth Bond film, will open around the world in November, the previous Bond film Skyfall, having earned over 1.1 billion dollars worldwide, making it the most popular Bond film, I believe, since the great heyday of the franchise back in the Sixties.
On the other hand, Sophie Hannah's authorized Poirot novel, The Monogram Murders, was published a year ago (admittedly not to resounding huzzahs from yours truly); and this year British television has already seen a new television series based (purportedly) on Christie's early Tommy and Tuppence tales and a three-part television film adaptation of her bestselling novel, And Then There Were None, will air in December 2015/January 2016.
Looks to me like both authors (and their series characters) are holding on with the public rather well!
One more Christie post later today, as Christie Commemorative Week comes to a close at The Passing Tramp.
The characters...bear little relation to reality.
ReplyDeleteThank goodness.
Gadgetry will date a story faster than slang, and, unfortunately, in 25 years James Bond will seem as dated as the mad-scientist movies of the 1930's do to us today....
ReplyDeleteThere's actually very little gadgetry in the Bond novels. As far as technology is concerned Christie has become much more dated than Fleming. People just don't solve crimes the way Poirot solves crimes any more. And people like Poirot don't solve crimes at all these days. There's no place in the modern world for amateur sleuths like Poirot (or Miss Marple or Lord Peter Wimsey or Campion or Philo Vance or Ellery Queen). Detection is the province of the police and policemen are dull bureaucrats or technocrats.
And that is why Agatha Christie's books are still in print today - because they bear no relation to reality. They're a lot more fun than reality.
That's also why Ian Fleming's books are still in print - because they bear no relation to reality.
If you want reality, read a textbook.
Well, I think his broader contention about Christie was that he thought the books had some relation to "human nature," the Bond tales not to much. Of course, like you say, demanding "reality" of essentially escapist literature, especially the thriller, seems something of a contradiction in terms. But even with the Bond film we often see critics condemning ones that are "silly" and "tongue-in-cheek" and praising ones that seem "gritty" and "more believable."
DeleteBut, anyway, I think it interesting for once to see a newspaper critic defending Christie as a realistic writer!
In any event, both Christie and Fleming created superb series character archetypes, who are iconic and, I would hazard to guess, everlasting.
In any event, both Christie and Fleming created superb series character archetypes, who are iconic and, I would hazard to guess, everlasting.
DeleteI agree wholeheartedly!