This is not a super-serious crime novel, but rather a lightly entertaining one in the mode, I think, of some of John Dickson Carr's wonderful historical mysteries. Criminy, there's even a locked room problem!
The novel is interestingly constructed around two separate investigations of two separate problems conducted by Sabina and Quincannon (this is how the authors refer to them)--which of course we know will ultimately connect!
Sabina is trying to catch a pickpocket, Quincannon a housebreaker (or pannyman, to use the criminal lingo of the book). Chapters are alternately headed Sabina and Quincannon, and we get a good sense of the two authors' distinct writing sensibilities in the chapters on "their" respective detectives.
Sabina is more empathetic and level-headed and less self-centered than Quincannon, who, nevertheless, I found to be a lot of fun (his immodest credo is that he will die in bed at the age of ninety--and not alone).
Once the first murder is discovered about a-third of the way into the novel, the pace picks up and we get an intriguing, fair play puzzle. The second murder offers no less than a locked room problem, which is always great to see (and unexpected) in a modern crime novel.
|Who is this madman?!|
The presence of this bughouse Sherlock has been criticized by a few people on Goodreads, I noticed, who have deemed him irritating. The real Sherlock Holmes was never irritating, they cry! Personally I was much amused with the demystifying approach to the Great Detective (a parody) that is taken in The Bughouse Affair.
Quincannon finds the bughouse Sherlock especially exasperating, because Quincannon himself likes to be the star of the show and his rival really is rather an insufferable know-all. Not everyone is as self-effacing as Watson!
The resolution of the novel cleverly finds each detective--Quincannon, bughouse Sherlock and Sabina--making an important contribution in untangling the web of mysteries.
|two authors plot a bughouse affair|
Quincannon muttered five short, colorful words, none of them remotely of a deductive nature.
[Luther Duff] was short, round, balding, fiftyish, and about as appetizing as a tainted oyster.
Quincannon grinned and added sagely, "The best-laid plans aren't always the best-planned lays."
I also enjoyed Quincannon's visit--for investigative purposes only--to the "parlor house" Fiddle Dee Dee, and I was deeply intrigued by the reference to the Hotel Nymphomania. Maybe we will see something of the latter in the next book!
Of course, there's a will they or won't they? aspect to the relationship between Carpenter and Quincannon left unresolved at the end of The Bughouse Affair. For the answer to that question and what will assuredly be another good mystery, I await the next novel in the series!
I'm glad you liked this one, Curt. Bill Pronzini is one of the finest writers in the field, and I really liked this collaboration with Marcia Muller -- will have to dig into her stuff in the near future.ReplyDelete
The impossible crime had me fooled because it was eerily similar to another one I came across, and I was convinced only that solution was possible. Turns out I was wrong. It was a well-played trick.
I also liked the romantic angle, which had the decency to *not* intrude on the story with its lovey-dovey-perfectness/forbiden-ness. You can understand Sabina's reasons for not wanting to get involved, even though she might feel some sort of attraction. It's a very believable situation.
I definitely liked how the you could see the distinct writing styles of the authors. Sabina has a Muller feel, just as Quincannon has a Nameless vibe.
I noticed that Quincannon collected temperance tracts! Reminded me of Nameless and pulps.
Since you've covered Leo Bruce recently (and wrote extensively on him), what did you think of my comparison with Case for Three Detectives were the solutions are concerned?ReplyDelete
I agree that the Leo Bruce comparison is apt. I know Bill Pronzini is a fan of Bruce.
Pronzini said that the "nod to CASE FOR THREE DETECTIVES was unintentional, at least on a conscious level.Delete
My reply: I still think it was a nice nod to Leo Bruce, even if it was unintentional. I'm sure he would've approved of the bughouse Holmes, but I think Beef would’ve groaned at another one of these amateurs making things unnecessarily complicated for proper investigators.
Pronzini is such a terrific writer and it's great to read that this has turned out so well - can't wait to get it. Thanks Curt.ReplyDelete